The big difference between oral and intravenous administration is that intravenous administration generally avoids the liver. That's (generally) why intravenous preparations use significantly less of the drug than oral, as they don't lose nearly as much active ingredients to filtering by the liver.
Having done a bit more research, it appears they only do this with their newest models. And it appears that the 75 actually does charge up to 100% of the pack. So the 60 is much better for the life of your battery pack.
I agree you have to do SOME overprovisioning of battery capacity in the battery packs (same as in SSDs). But they aren't only doing it to improve the lifetime of the battery, they're also doing it to artificially segment their market. Every Model S has the same size battery, but if you pay more they'll let you charge it more.
I mean the first sentence is "We have talked about the power of connecting with fans and giving them a reason to buy" So technically he did mention it in the article.
That's why I think this one is perfect. Because it is so obvious that none of their copyrighted material is used. Other cases often have some fair use element or something else that made the use non-infringing, this one there wasn't even USE to begin with.
But I definitely wouldn't blame him for not suing because 512(f) definitely seems to be nothing at this point.
Just wanted to point out that there are multiple places in the article where you misspell the accused terrorist's name. I believe (based on the second Vice article and the ruling by the judge) that it should be "Shirdon" not "Shidron".
I think you should still link to them, but do something (I'm not sure what, I like the different colored link idea someone said earlier) to denote that they're blocking ad-blocking users.
One of the reasons I like TechDirt so much is because I can ALWAYS get a link to the source material and evaluate it for myself. I would definitely continue reading even if you stopped linking to them (because you site is the shit and your content is the best) but I would prefer you continue!
"And forget about the elegant fix of usage-based pricing, i.e., charging each customer according to his demand on the infrastructure."
I'm sick and tired of this claim. That user demand on the infrastructure is at a gigabyte level. The constraints on the network aren't in the total AMOUNT of data it can convey, but in how FAST it can convey that. If I buy a switch with 10 1Gb/s ports on it, and 10 1Gb/s internet connections, I'm perfectly capable of delivering INFINITE gigabytes as long as I deliver those gigabytes at under 10Gb/s aggregate at any one time.
So, the demand put on the infrastructure, and therefore what we should base pricing on in "usage-based pricing" the ISPs want so badly is BITS PER SECOND, not TOTAL BITS TRANSFERRED.
They really need to stop lying all over the place.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Kumouri.
Re: Re: Re: how harmful is IV acetaminophen?
The big difference between oral and intravenous administration is that intravenous administration generally avoids the liver. That's (generally) why intravenous preparations use significantly less of the drug than oral, as they don't lose nearly as much active ingredients to filtering by the liver.
Re: Solution for phone scammers
I was just about to post a similar comment, but I decided to search the page first. Good think I did, haha.
Lenny is the BEST.
Re: Re: Is it a bad thing?
I use the "Can I Stream It?" app (on Android, no idea on iOS) to find the streaming service that has that show or movie I want to watch.
That only covers one of those problems, but it's better than nothing :D
Re: Re: Re: Limiting battery capacity
Having done a bit more research, it appears they only do this with their newest models. And it appears that the 75 actually does charge up to 100% of the pack. So the 60 is much better for the life of your battery pack.
Re: Re: Limiting battery capacity
I agree you have to do SOME overprovisioning of battery capacity in the battery packs (same as in SSDs). But they aren't only doing it to improve the lifetime of the battery, they're also doing it to artificially segment their market. Every Model S has the same size battery, but if you pay more they'll let you charge it more.
Re: Re: Re:
I mean the first sentence is "We have talked about the power of connecting with fans and giving them a reason to buy" So technically he did mention it in the article.
Re: Re: Perfect case for 512(f)?
That's why I think this one is perfect. Because it is so obvious that none of their copyrighted material is used. Other cases often have some fair use element or something else that made the use non-infringing, this one there wasn't even USE to begin with.
But I definitely wouldn't blame him for not suing because 512(f) definitely seems to be nothing at this point.
Perfect case for 512(f)?
Is it just me or is this not the perfect case to get 512(f) damages?
I mean there is 0 way HBO could have actually thought anything in the video was infringing.
Shirdon, not Shidron
Just wanted to point out that there are multiple places in the article where you misspell the accused terrorist's name. I believe (based on the second Vice article and the ruling by the judge) that it should be "Shirdon" not "Shidron".
I think you should still link to them, but do something (I'm not sure what, I like the different colored link idea someone said earlier) to denote that they're blocking ad-blocking users.
One of the reasons I like TechDirt so much is because I can ALWAYS get a link to the source material and evaluate it for myself. I would definitely continue reading even if you stopped linking to them (because you site is the shit and your content is the best) but I would prefer you continue!
I wonder if the station will be fined for showing a penis on live TV...
"Usage-Based Pricing"
"And forget about the elegant fix of usage-based pricing, i.e., charging each customer according to his demand on the infrastructure."
I'm sick and tired of this claim. That user demand on the infrastructure is at a gigabyte level. The constraints on the network aren't in the total AMOUNT of data it can convey, but in how FAST it can convey that. If I buy a switch with 10 1Gb/s ports on it, and 10 1Gb/s internet connections, I'm perfectly capable of delivering INFINITE gigabytes as long as I deliver those gigabytes at under 10Gb/s aggregate at any one time.
So, the demand put on the infrastructure, and therefore what we should base pricing on in "usage-based pricing" the ISPs want so badly is BITS PER SECOND, not TOTAL BITS TRANSFERRED.
They really need to stop lying all over the place.