The entire tone of this post suggests the OP thinks it is preposterous that the most Evil corporation in the universe could actually be guilty. Dependent on SEO income, much? Garbage Post - and that is being generous.
Incredibly silly? What a COMPLETELY ignorant thing to say. If you had been around, you would have KNOWN how effective it was. There would BE no Fox News propaganda if it were still here. This site is about to go off my RSS feed page, now that I know what a simpleton is in charge.
Judge Forrest is a well-known corporate advocate. If there exists any basis for finding in favor of a large corporation, she will find it. If none exists, she will invent it - she's creative that way. Here, while the plaintiff is an individual, the real purpose of the ruling is to create causes of action for the large corporate IP owners - the only ones with the deep pockets to use this right of action in a widespread basis.