Assault: Intentionally putting another person in reasonable apprehension of an imminent harmful or offensive contact. Physical injury does not need to result.
Obviously (?) this excludes the legal use of force, or else soldiers fighting in a war or US states executing prisoners would be forms of assault. Or don't you want security officers to protect you? I ask that as a serious question, since it seems (?) to be the same people who object to law enforcement as object to the right to self-defense.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by redmore.
Re: I suspect they are vastly under reporting CBP assualts
Assault: Intentionally putting another person in reasonable apprehension of an imminent harmful or offensive contact. Physical injury does not need to result.
Obviously (?) this excludes the legal use of force, or else soldiers fighting in a war or US states executing prisoners would be forms of assault. Or don't you want security officers to protect you? I ask that as a serious question, since it seems (?) to be the same people who object to law enforcement as object to the right to self-defense.